kazecveКазанский экономический вестникKazan economic vestnik2305-4212КФУkazecve-216Research ArticleФИНАНСЫ И КРЕДИТFINANCE AND CREDITТеоретические аспекты ключевых рисков при реализации проектов государственночастного партнерства и алгоритм их минимизацииTheoretical aspects of the main risks in the implementation of public-private partnership projects and algorithm of their minimizationАхметшинаЭ. Р.AkhmetshinaE. R.

Ахметшина Эльвира Раисовна, кандидат экономических наук, доцент

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor

ERKiamova@kpfu.ruСафиуллинаА. М.SafiullinaA. M.

Сафиуллина Алина Маратовна, кандидат экономических наук

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor

Kfu.safiullina@yandex.ruКазанский (Приволжский) федеральный университетРоссияKazan (Volga Region) Federal UniversityRussian Federation202417072024111823Copyright © Ахметшина Э.Р., Сафиуллина А.М., 20242024Ахметшина Э.Р., Сафиуллина А.М.Akhmetshina E.R., Safiullina A.M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://kazecve.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/216

Данная статья посвящена анализу рисков, возникающих в процессе реализации совместных проектов государства и делового сообщества, и алгоритму их минимизации. Государственно-частное партнерство (ГЧП) является одной из форм сотрудничества, когда происходит перераспределение рисков между участниками проекта, что впоследствии формирует более эффективное распределение бюджета. Описаны политические и финансовые риски, как одни из основных, возникающих в рамках государственно-частного партнерства (ГЧП), а система распределения рисков заключается в том, что конкретный вид риска по договору несет тот партнер, который имеет навык и опыт эффективного менеджмента по управлению и контролю данным риском. ГЧП позволяет распределять риски между партнерами, что создает условия для эффективного функционирования объектов социальной инфраструктуры.

 Представлены условия оптимального перераспределения рисков между партнерами и предложен алгоритм минимизации рисков для реализации успешных проектов ГЧП. Данный алгоритм может быть использован в реальной практике участниками ГЧП при принятии решения о реализации совместного проекта с учетом потенциальных рисков. позволяя такому партнерству стать одним из самых результативных. Чаще всего государство несет политические риски или вносит исправления в нормативно-правовые акты, в то время как деловое общество ответственно за бизнес-риски. 

This article focuses on the analysis of risks arising in the process of implementing joint projects between the state and the business community and the algorithm for minimizing them. Public-private partnership (PPP) is one of the forms of cooperation where risks are redistributed between project participants, which subsequently forms a more efficient budget allocation. Political and financial risks are described as one of the main ones arising within the framework of public-private partnership (PPP), and the risk allocation system consists in the fact that a specific type of risk under the contract is borne by the partner who has the skill and experience of effective management to manage and control this risk. PPP allows to distribute risks between partners, which creates conditions for the effective functioning of social infrastructure facilities.

The conditions for optimal redistribution of risks between partners are also presented and an algorithm for minimizing risks for the implementation of successful PPP projects is proposed. This algorithm can be used in real practice by PPP participants when deciding on the implementation of a joint project, taking into account potential risks. allowing such a partnership to become one of the most productive. Most often, the state bears political risks or makes corrections to regulatory legal acts, while the business community is responsible for business risks.

государственно-частное партнерстворискиоценка рисковуправление рискамираспределение рисковинфраструктурные облигацииконтрактпроектpublic-private partnershiprisksrisk assessmentrisk managementrisk allocationinfrastructure bondsa contracta projectReferencesAmeyaw E.E., Chan A.P.C. Evaluation and ranking of risk factors in public-private partnership water supply projects in developing countries using fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach // Expert Systems with Applications. – 2015. – No. 42 (12). – P. 5102–5116.Ameyaw E.E., Chan A.P.C. Evaluation and ranking of risk factors in public-private partnership water supply projects in developing countries using fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach // Expert Systems with Applications. – 2015. – No. 42 (12). – P. 5102–5116.Li B., Akintoye A., Hardcastle C. VFM and Risk Allocation Models in Construction PPP Projects // School of Built and Natural Environment. – Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University, 2001. – P. 20.Li B., Akintoye A., Hardcastle C. VFM and Risk Allocation Models in Construction PPP Projects // School of Built and Natural Environment. – Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University, 2001. – P. 20.De Palma A., Leruth L.E., Prunier G. Towards a principal-agent based typology of risks in publicprivate partnerships // Reflets et Perspectives de la Vie Economique. – 2012. – No. 51 (2). – P. 57–73.De Palma A., Leruth L.E., Prunier G. Towards a principal-agent based typology of risks in public-private partnerships // Reflets et Perspectives de la Vie Economique. – 2012. – No. 51 (2). – P. 57–73.Ghorbani A., Ravanshadnia M., Nobakht M.B. Survey of Risks in Public Private Partnership Highway Projects in Iran // Smart Construction and Management in the Context of New Technology: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management. – 2014. – P. 482–492.Ghorbani A., Ravanshadnia M., Nobakht M.B. Survey of Risks in Public Private Partnership Highway Projects in Iran // Smart Construction and Management in the Context of New Technology: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management. – 2014. – P. 482–492.Jingning Y., Wenkang L. Risk Assessment Model of Urban Subway Based on Public Private Partnership Mode // Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Engineering Applications (ISDEA 2015). – 2016. – Art. 7462715. – P. 700–703.Jingning Y., Wenkang L. Risk Assessment Model of Urban Subway Based on Public Private Partnership Mode // Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Engineering Applications (ISDEA 2015). – 2016. – Art. 7462715. – P. 700–703.Leruth L.E. Public-Private Cooperation in Infrastructure Development: A Principal-Agent Story of Contingent Liabilities, Fiscal Risks, and Other (Un) pleasant Surprises // Networks and Spatial Economics. – 2012. – No. 12 (2). – P. 223–237.Leruth L.E. Public-Private Cooperation in Infrastructure Development: A Principal-Agent Story of Contingent Liabilities, Fiscal Risks, and Other (Un)pleasant Surprises // Networks and Spatial Economics. – 2012. – No. 12 (2). – P. 223–237.Marques R.C., Berg S. Risks, contracts, and private-sector participation in infrastructure // Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. – 2011. – No. 137 (11). – P. 925–932.Marques R.C., Berg S. Risks, contracts, and private-sector participation in infrastructure // Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. – 2011. – No. 137 (11). – P. 925–932.Santoso D.S., Joewono T.B., Wibowo A., Sinaga H.P.A., Santosa W. Public-private partnerships for tollway construction and operation: Risk assessment and allocation from the perspective of investors // Journal of Construction in Developing Countries. – 2012. – No. 17 (2). – P. 45–66.Santoso D.S., Joewono T.B., Wibowo A., Sinaga H.P.A., Santosa W. Public-private partnerships for tollway construction and operation: Risk assessment and allocation from the perspective of investors // Journal of Construction in Developing Countries. – 2012. – No. 17 (2). – P. 45–66.Sfakianakis E., van de Laar M. Fiscal effects and public risk in public-private partnerships // Built Environment Project and Asset Management. – 2013. – No. 3 (2). – P. 181–198.Sfakianakis E., van de Laar M. Fiscal effects and public risk in public-private partnerships // Built Environment Project and Asset Management. – 2013. – No. 3 (2). – P. 181–198.Варнавский В.Г. Государственно-частное партнерство: в 2 т. – М.: ИМЭМО РАН, 2009. – Т. 1. – 312 с.Varnavsky V.G. Public-private partnership: in 2 vol. – M.: IMEMO RAS, 2009. – Vol. 1. – 312 p.Климов П.Е. Распределение рисков в проектах государственно-частного партнерства // Управление экономическими системами: электронный научный журнал. – 2012. – № 8 (44). – С. 1–18.Klimov P.E. Risks allocation in projects of public-private partnership // Economic Systems Management: Online Research Journal. – 2012. – No. 8 (44). – P. 1–18.Шарингер Л. Новая модель инвестиционного партнерства государства и частного сектора // Российский экономический журнал. – 2004. – № 9–10. – С. 41–52.Scharinger L. A new model of the investment partnership between the state and the private sector // Russian Economic Journal. – 2004. – No. 9–10. – P. 41–52.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.