State regulation of agribusiness in digital ecosystems
Abstract
The relevance of the article is due to the fact that against the backdrop of ongoing digital transformations of the economy, the standard set of methods and tools for state regulation of agribusiness is not always as effective as in previous periods. The novelty of the study lies in the improvement of conceptual approaches to state regulation of the ecosystem activities of agribusiness entities (financing, insurance, hedging, public procurement, commodity interventions, consulting, licensing, etc.), which differ from the known ones by taking into account the main characteristics of the digital economy (growth of data volumes, transparency, speed of information transfer, minimization of intermediary links, etc.), which determine the modernization of the regulatory impact. It is substantiated that it is advisable to modernize the regulatory impact by developing methods for the use of digital technologies (big data, artificial intelligence, cloud computing, etc.) and digital products (QR-coding of products, digital letters of credit, digital bank guarantees, smart contracts, etc.) to the indicated areas (financing, insurance, hedging, public procurement, commodity and procurement interventions, consulting, licensing, certification, etc.). The expected effects from the use of modernized methods and tools of state regulation of the ecosystem activities of agribusiness entities for the industry as a whole come down to reducing the regulatory burden and simplifying the receipt of state support measures. For public administration, the effects of using modernized methods and tools of state regulation can manifest themselves in the following areas: optimizing information exchange with industry entities; increasing the level of control over the movement of budget funds; strengthening the targeting of state support measures; increasing the speed of interaction with agribusiness entities and accelerating the response to control actions.
About the Authors
O. M. Korobeynikova
Volgograd State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor
A. S. Gorbacheva
Volgograd State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Economics, Associate Professor
T. A. Chekrygina
Volgograd State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Economics, Associate Professor
M. D. Vorotnikov
Volgograd State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Undergraduate
References
1. Alekseev A.A., Kruzhkova T.I., Ruchkin A.V., Ruschitskaya O.A., Ruschitskaya O.E. From the Internet of things to the Internet of behavior: state regulation of the digital transformation of the agro-industrial complex // Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. – 2021. – No. 6-1. – P. 5–13.
2. Korobeynikov D.A., Owl M.A. Methods of analytical assessment of the economic dynamics of agricultural production // News of the Nizhnevolzhsky agro-university complex: Science and higher professional education. – 2011. – No. 2 (22). – P. 243–249.
3. Korobeynikova O.M., Ocheretyanaya D.V., Peters I.A., Shaldokhina S.Yu. Digital ecosystems for agribusiness // Agrarian Russia. – 2022. – No. 6. – P. 40–47.
4. Krasiy R.S. State regulation of the agro-industrial complex in the conditions of sanctions and anti-sanctions// International Journal of Constitutional and State Law. – 2018. – No. 1. – P. 102–104.
5. Morozova I.A., Volkov S.K., Orlova O.V. Trends in the development of the agro-industrial complex of Russia in the conditions of the WTO // Regional Economics: Theory and Practice. – 2014. – No. 44(371). – P. 41–50.
6. Popova L.V., Korobeynikov D.A., Korobeynikova O.M., Telitchenko D.N. State regulation in the organizational and economic mechanism of agriculture // Proceedings of the Nizhnevolzhsky agro-university complex: Science and higher professional education. – 2016. – No. 4 (44). – P. 292–299.
7. Burkaltseva D.D., Simchenko N.A., Tsekhla S.Yu., Blazhevich O.G., Polskaya S.I., Guk O.A., Yanovskaya A.A., Zharova A.R. Methodology for assessing the level of digital development of the ecosystem of the region // Academy of Strategic Management Journal. – 2021. – Vol. 20. – No. 6. – P. 9–16.
8. Burkaltseva D.D., Betskov A.V., Kilyaskhanov H.Sh., Demin G.I., Grischenko L.L., Timoshenko O.E., Tyulin A.S. Psychological features of cybercriminal behavior in committing financial crimes under conditions of digital transformation of socioeconomic systems // Opcion. – 2018. – Vol. 34. – No 85. – P. 1642–1653.
9. Deng F., Yang L., Gong Q., Guo G. Evaluation of High-quality Economic Development Based on Entropy Weight Method: Taking Chengdu-Chongqing City Agglomeration as Example // ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. – 2021. –P. 41–47.
10. Feng M., Guo H. Research on the evaluation of high-quality economic development based on factor analysis // Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. – 2019. – Vol. 78(12). – P. 827–830.
11. Volkov S.K. Social and economic disproportion of development of Russian territories // Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies. – 2015. – Vol. 15. – No. 2. – P. 137–144.
Review
For citations:
Korobeynikova O.M., Gorbacheva A.S., Chekrygina T.A., Vorotnikov M.D. State regulation of agribusiness in digital ecosystems. Kazan economic vestnik. 2022;(4):14-18. (In Russ.)
Views:
37
Email this article 