Modification of the higher education coordination model
Abstract
The relevance of the analysis based on the results of modification of the procedure for the distribution of student admission benchmarks in educational organizations is due to the need to reduce imbalances that are formed as a result of a combination of the principles of market and hierarchical coordination of higher education. The purpose of the article is a methodological analysis of a new order of distribution of student admission benchmarks from the standpoint of overcoming these imbalances. Updating the model, firstly, in terms of introducing growth coefficients and prioritization of territorial development, makes it possible to compensate for the lack of budget places in accordance with the staffing needs of regional economies; secondly, high values of the coefficient characterizing the ratio of per capita income and subsistence are used to assess the possibilities of reducing the share of budget financing of total expenditures on higher education in the following areas training, causing a rush demand; Thirdly, the use of the migration outflow coefficient is envisaged to assess the effects of graduate migration and the propensity to pay for education, which affects the share of federal budget funding for the region as a whole. As a method for determining the results of the introduction of the new methodology, a comparison of the distribution of places of admission to budgetary and paid places in higher education institutions is used according to the data of 2020–2021.
The obtained results testify to the possibility of overcoming the imbalance formed by the market component of the coordination of relations in the field of higher education by adjusting the procedure for distributing admission benchmarks between educational organizations.
About the Authors
S. V. Novikov
Ufa State Aviation Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Economics, Professor
A. E. Plakhin
Ural State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor
References
1. Coleman M., DeLeire T. An economic model of locus of control and the human capital investment decision // Journal of Human Resources. – 2003. – Vol. 38. – No. 3. – P. 701–721.
2. George E.S. Positioning higher education for the knowledge based economy // Higher education. – 2006. – Vol. 52. – No. 4. – P. 589–610.
3. Elliott D.S., Levin S.L., Meisel J.B. Measuring the economic impact of institutions of higher education // Research in Higher Education. – 1988. – Vol. 28. – No. 1. – P. 17–33.
4. Gabdrakhmanov N.K., Leshukov O.V., Platonova D.P. Provision of budget places for regional higher education systems taking into account demographic trends // University Management: Practice and Analysis. – 2019. – Vol. 23. – No. 4. – P. 32–45.
5. Brovkina I.S. Mechanisms for planning the volume of control figures for the admission of citizens by a technical university // Quality of education: theory and practice of assessment. – 2015. – P. 8–12.
6. Denisov A.S. et al. Staffing of sustainable rural development project management // Revista ESPACIOS. – 2017. – Vol. 38. – No. 48. – P. 11–23.
7. Kulikov M.M., Dulin A.N., Dulin R.A. Staffing of cluster initiatives in Russia // The International Science and Technology Conference “FarEastСon”. – Springer, Cham, 2018. – P. 81–89.
8. Storper M. Territorial development in the global learning economy: the challenge to developing countries // Review of International Political Economy. – 1995. – Vol. 2. – No. 3. – P. 394–424.
9. Studnikov S.S. Higher education in Russia: the heyday of economic dominance // The world of the new economy. – 2021. – No. 1. – P. 112–120.
10. Alpatov G.E. Consequences of the reduction of human capital in the higher education system // Scientific journal of NIU ITMO. The series “Economics and Environmental Management”. – 2019. – No. 2. – P. 36–41.
11. Fadeeva I.M., Sofronov D.A. Trajectories of interregional migrations of university graduates of the Volga Federal District // News of higher educational institutions. Volga region. Social sciences. – 2018. – No. 1 (45). – P. 108–119.
12. Byuraeva Yu.G. Post-educational migration of university graduates: trajectories, factors, intentions // ECO. – 2020. – No. 10. – P. 147–167.
13. Antosik L.V., Ivashina N.V. Factors and directions of interregional migration of university graduates in Russia // Education issues. – 2021. – No. 2. – P. 107–125.
14. Davydiuk L., Kalinina S., Kovalevska V. Formation and development of the international labor market: methodological discussion // Sustainable development under the conditions of European integration. – Part II. – 2019. – P. 283.
15. Global employment: an international investigation into the future of work / M. Simai, V.M. Moghadam, A. Kuddo (ed.). – United Nations University Press, 1995. – Vol. 1. – P. 247–256.
16. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 15, 2021 N 1750 “On Approval of the Rules for Establishing Admission Control Figures for Professions, specialties and areas of Training and (or) Enlarged Groups of Professions, specialties and areas of training for Training in educational programs of secondary vocational and Higher education for Organizations Engaged in educational activities, and also by groups of scientific specialties and (or) scientific specialties for training in programs of training of scientific and scientificpedagogical personnel in postgraduate (adjunct) at the expense of budget allocations of the federal budget and the invalidation of certain acts of the Government of the Russian Federation”.
17. Information on the rules of admission to universities. – URL: https://minobrnauki.gov.ru/abitur / Electronic resource (date accessed: 21.08.2022).
Review
For citations:
Novikov S.V., Plakhin A.E. Modification of the higher education coordination model. Kazan economic vestnik. 2022;(4):65-72. (In Russ.)
Views:
10
Email this article 