Teaching financial disciplines online: administrative aspect

   The object of the research is a course in financial management, taught entirely in a distance learning format.

   The subject of the research is the administrative aspect of teaching this discipline.

   The research was carried out by interviewing students. In total, 46 students took part in the survey, 61 % of them were undergraduate students, 39 % were graduate students. Among the respondents, the share of foreign students was 15 %. We identified the following parameters for assessing the administrative aspect of training in a discipline: ease of learning a financial management course remotely, audibility of the teacher, visibility of the materials being demonstrated, ease of making notes / notes during training, the ability to ask questions to the teacher, quality of presentations and materials accompanying training, pace of training. 85 % of the listeners highly appreciated the convenience of remotely learning the financial management course, on average, the rating of audibility was 9,26 points, and visibility was 9.39 points out of 10 possible. The quality of presentations and accompanying material was assessed as high - an average of 9.8 points for all respondents. 82 % of students found it very convenient to form records in the learning process. 93 % of students considered the pace of learning to be normal, a small number noted the pace of learning as too fast or too slow. 100 % of the students answered that they had the opportunity to ask a question to the teacher. The study showed that students highly appreciated the administrative aspect of distance learning in the course “financial management”.

1. Baranets S.N. Contact vs distant vs online: how the harmony of methodological and methodical approaches is possible // The proceedings of scientific and methodical conference SZIU RANKHIGS. – 2019. – Vol. 1 – P. 22–30.

2. Degtev A.I. Do not miss “Foams” in distance learning opportunities for wide and effective implementation of distance learning in military education // Bulletin of Millitay Education. – 2019. – No. 3 (18). – P. 63–65.

3. Tolsteneva A.A., Gruzdeva M.L., Lagunova M.V., Katkova O.V., Prokhorova O.N. Normative and methodical ground of realization of educational program of a university in conditions of networking // Modern issues of science and education. – 2018. – Vol. 5 – P. 134.

4. Karhanyan G.G. Analysis of distance learning in force majeure conditions // Cross-Cultural Studies: Education and Science. – 2020. – Vol. 5. – No. 2. – P. 92–96.

5. Aksenova E.I. Professional skills and competences of a teacher in the conditions of the transition to distance forms of learning // Labour and Social Relations Journal. – 2020. – Vol. 6. – P. 210–218.

6. Akhunova Ye.A. Certain aspects of e-learning course development for distance learning // International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. – 2020. – Vol. 6-1. – Is. 45. – P. 69–71.

7. Galin D.I. The concept of distance learning in high school, design organization, and management // Information Technology Problems and Solutions. – 2020. – Vol. 1. – Is. 10. – P. 10–16.

8. Fadeeva V.A. Distance language learning with powerschool learning LMS in a higher education context: an empirical study // Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and intercultural communication. – 2021. – Vol. 1. – P. 185–192.

9. Gilbert L., Gale V. Principles of e-learning systems engineering. – 1^st ed. – Oxford [etc.]: Chandos Publishing, 2007. – 350 p.

10. Catherall P. Delivering e-learning for information services in higher education. – 1^st ed. – Oxford [etc.]: Chandos Publishing, 2004. – 232 p.

11. Polumeeva I. Teacher-student, how not to lose contact in distance learning // Polish journal of science. – 2021. – Vol. 40. – Is. 40. – P. 35–36.