Features and contradictions of formation and development of innovative human potential

   In this work, economic and statistical functions are built, reflecting the positive sustainable impact of the human development index of the leading countries of the world on the intensity of investments in research and innovation and the share of innovative products in the structure of industrial production of the leading countries of the world, which made it possible to confirm the conclusion about the direct and close nature of the relationship between the processes of human capital formation and the development of innovative individuals. The main models of the formation of innovative personalities are highlighted: American, German, Japanese, Chinese, South Asian, and Latin American. It is shown that the most preferable for the Russian Federation would be a synthesis of the German and South Asian models of the formation of an innovative person, combining regional and cluster approaches to the problem under study. The main problems of the formation of innovative personalities are highlighted, such as social and information inequality, insufficient level of innovation culture, problems of development of the health care system, the complexity of effective cooperation and integration in the field of innovation, corruption and insufficient interaction between the state and private business in the field of innovation. It has been substantiated that the interaction of human capital and the development process of innovative individuals is of a dialectical, mutually reinforcing, cyclical nature: creating conditions for the development and improvement of innovative individuals, the human capital system in the state thereby provides, increasing the role and importance of innovative individuals in economic development , an increase in opportunities for own expanded reproduction in the long run – due to an increase in tax revenues provided, other things being equal, on the basis of economic growth caused by factors of innovative modernization, as well as a result of an increase in the net cash flow of private companies that attract innovative individuals and providing, on this basis, the activation and improvement of the efficiency of production and innovation activities.

1. Konovalova T.A. Increasing the efficiency of economic development of a single-industry town of strategic importance : diss. Ph.D. – SPb., 2013. – P. 54.

2. Russia and the countries of the world: statistical yearbook. – M.: From the Federal State Statistics Service, 2019.

3. Vershinskaya O.N. The readiness of the Russian population to live and work in the information society // Problems of overcoming the “digital inequality” in Russia and the CIS countries: Proceedings of the International seminar. – M.: House of the Government of the Russian Federation, 2000.

4. Zaborovskaya O.V. Formation and development of human capital in the region. – SPb.: Publishing house of SPGUEiF, 2005. – P. 51.

5. Becker G. Human behavior: an economic approach. Selected Works on Economic Theory. – M.: GU Higher School of Economics, 2003. – 650 p.

6. Vlasov F. Cultural and moral capital (indicators, assessments and role in the economy) // Man and labor. – 2013. – No. 9. – P. 44–47.

7. Greenberg R., Rubinstein A. Rational behavior of the state in a mixed economy: problems of theory and methodology. – M., 2013. – 218 p.

8. Islamutdinov V.F., Shangaraev R.G. On the question of the concept of an innovative person // Questions of innovative economics. – 2011. – No. 4. – P. 3–12.

9. Kiselev S.V., Strekalova G.R., Nugaeva G.R. An innovative type of development of the regional economy. – Kazan: KSTU, 2010. – 196 p.

10. Stiglitz J. Economics of the public sector. – M.: Publishing house of Moscow State University, 1997. – 720 p.

11. Khomenko V.V. Methodological concept of political economy of human development // Fundamentals of the economic theory of human capital. – Kazan: AN RT, 2007. – P. 16–30.

12. Paley T.F. Innovation management. – Kazan: Folio, 2011. – P. 39.

13. Khrutsky V.E. South Korean paradox. – M.: Finance and statistics, 1993. – P. 51.

14. Glazyev S.Yu. Strategy for the outstripping development of Russia in the context of the global crisis. – M.: Economics, 2010. – P. 71.

15. Dorokhov A.V. Innovative behavior and social stratification: the problem of correlation // Business journal. – 2013. – No. 4. – P. 11.

16. Safiullin L.N., Safiullin A.R., Khaziakhmetov B.Z. Structural studies of the competitiveness of the Republic of Tatarstan. – Kazan: Kazan University Publishing House, 2011. – 269 p.

17. Rose-Ackerman S. Corruption and the state: causes, consequences, reforms. – M.: Logos, 2010. – P. 54.

18. Saibel Ya.V. Modern trends in innovative development of the Russian economy // Contradictions and trends in the development of modern Russian society : collection of scientific articles of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. – M.: Publishing House of the Moscow University named after S.Yu. Witte, 2016. – P. 184–194.

19. Fuentelsaz L., Maicas J.P., Montero J. Entrepreneurs and innovation: The contingent role of institutional factors // International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship. – 2018. – Vol. 36. – Is. 6. – P. 686–711.

20. Black C. The Dynamics of Modernization: A Study in Comparative History. – N.Y.: Harper Colophon Books, 2008. – P. 186–187.

21. Denison E.F. The Unimportance of the Embodied Question // A.E.R., LIV (March, 1964).

22. Eisner R. Extended Accounts for National Oncome and Product // Journal of Economic Literature. – 1988. – No. 26.

23. Schultz T.W. Human Capital: Policy Issues and Research Opportunities // Human Resources: Fiftieth Anniversary Colloquium VI. – N.Y., 1975. – 20 p.