Theoretical aspects of innovative entrepreneurship as a socio-cultural phenomenon in the economic development of the country
Abstract
Today, the long-term competitive success of a company depends on its innovative activity, the main task of which is the development of a market niche and taking a leadership position. The development of the innovation process reflects the general state of the economy and is caused by socio-economic changes. The main background of these changes is the formation of a new corporate culture, order and methods of coordination and interaction between subjects of innovative activity. In this article the author discusses the phenomenon of innovative entrepreneurship, which is determined by the fact that it is one of the most important factors of sustainable economic development and life of any country and leads to an active search for new paradigms to cope with the constant changes in the era of integration and globalization of relations. The task was set and solved to establish such a relationship based on the results of applying a complex index known as the index of structural-dynamic analysis, which is known in the foreign literature as the “shift-share analysis” tool. The application of the method of structural-dynamic analysis to assess the competitiveness of regional economies will produce results that put those regions that have large or dynamically developing agglomerations in the lead. This will give grounds to recognize the importance of this organizational form of economic space for the formation of a critical mass of competitive industries.
About the Author
Yu. R. Vikulenko
Central Kazakhstan Academy
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Master Degree, Senior Lecturer
Karaganda
References
1. Ansoff I. Strategic Management: Shortened version from English / science ed. – L.I. Evenko. – Moscow: Ekonomica, 1989. –Р. 519.
2. Antropov M.S. Management of knowledge, creativity and innovations in multinational organizations : textbook. – Moscow: PFUR, 2008. – 190 p.
3. Borodkin F.M., Ayvazyan S.A. Social Indicators. – M.: UNITY-DANA, 2014.
4. Weber M. Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism. – Moscow: The institute of the academy of sciences of the USSR, 1972. – Vol. 1. – Р. 109.
5. Voronov A.A., Dylnova Z.M. Entrepreneurship as a special type of social activity. – Saratov: Izvestia Saratov University. New version. – Ser. 6 Sociology. Political science. – Vol. 5. – No. 1–2. – 2005. – Р. 11–20.
6. Granberg A.G. Fundamentals of Regional Economy : Textbook for Universities. – Moscow: Publishing house of higher school of economics, 2000. – Р. 67–74.
7. Drucker P. Effective Management. Economic Problems and Optimal Decisions: transl. from English. – FAIR-PRESS, 1998. – Р. 288.
8. Sombart W. Sociology / translated from German. Sociology / translated from German I.D. Markuson. – Leningrad: MYSL, 2003. – Р. 133.
9. Marx K., Engels F. Selected works: in 15 vol. – Moscow: Progress, 1991.
10. Mises L. The individual, the market and the legal state / Anthology edited by D. Antiseri, M. Baldini. – S.S.: Pnevma, 1999. – Р. 196.
11. Knight F.H. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. – Moscow: Delo, 2003. – Р. 360.
12. Smith A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. – Moscow: Eksmo, 2007. – Р. 960.
13. Say J-B. Treatise on Political Economy. Economic sophisms. Economic Harmonies / eds., introductory article and committee by M.K. Bunkina and A.M. Semenov. – M.: Delo, 2000.
14. Smelser N. Sociology. – Moscow: Phoenix, 1994. – Р. 479.
15. Thurgot J. Reflections on the Creation and Distribution of Wealth: Values and Money / translated and supplemented by A.N. Miklashevsky. – Yuriev: 1905. – P. 80.
16. Schumpeter J. Theory of Economic Development. Capitalism, Sociology and Democracy / translated from German by V.S. Avtonomova, М.S. Lyubskiy, А.Yu. Chepurenko. – MOSCOW: EXMO, 2007. – Р. 864.
17. 2016: forecasts for the economic and technological development of IT. – URL: https://www.pcweek.ua/themes/detail.php?ID=151032
18. Badri M. Dimensions of Industrial Location Factors: Review and Exploration // Journal of Business and Public Affairs. – 2007. – Vol. 1. – No. 2. – P. 1–27.
19. Capello R. Entrepreneurship and spatial externalities: Theory and measurement // The Annals of Regional Science. – 2002. – Vol. 36. – P. 387–402.
20. Czamanski S. Identification of industrial clusters and complexes: a comparison of methods and findings // Urban Studies. – 1979. – Vol. 16. – P. 61–80.
21. Jacobs J. The Economies of Cities. – N.Y.: Random House, 1969. – 268 p.
22. Karlsson C., Zhang W. The role of universities in regional development Endogenous human capital and growth in a two-region model // The Annals of Regional Science. – 2001. – Vol. 35. – P. 179–197.
23. Maillat D. The innovation process and the role of the milieu // Regions Reconsidered: Economic Networks, Innovation, and Local Development. – London: Mansell, 1991. – P. 103–117.
24. Park S. Regional issues in the Pacific Rim // Papers in Regional Science. – 2000. – Vol. 79. – P. 333–342.
25. Pinchot G. Intrapreneuring: why you don’t have to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur. – N.Y.: Harper and Row, 1985. – 400 p.
26. Perroux F. Economic space: theory and applications // Quarterly Journal of Economics. – 1950. – Vol. 64. – P. 89–104.
27. Porter M. Location, clusters, and the “new” micro-economics of competition // Business Economics. – 1998. – Vol. 33. – Is. 1. – P. 7–13.
28. Schuler R. Transportation and telecommunications networks: Planning urban infrastructure for the 21<sup>st</sup> century // Urban Studies. – 1992. – Vol. 39. – Is. 2. – P. 297–310.
29. Shibusawa H. Cyberspace and physical space in an urban economy // Papers in Regional Science. – 2000. – Vol. 79. – P. 253–270.
Review
For citations:
Vikulenko Yu.R. Theoretical aspects of innovative entrepreneurship as a socio-cultural phenomenon in the economic development of the country. Kazan economic vestnik. 2021;(4):106-116. (In Russ.)
Views:
30
Email this article 